Thursday, October 23, 2008

Not so inconvenient truth

The Great Global Warming Swindle - a Documentary Film by Martin Durkin created furor among scientist. Not just questioned about greenhouse theory but also raising doubt that global warming driven by human activity.

First aired in UK on March 2007, already received 265 complaints about the programme, one of which was a 176-page detailed complaint co-authored by a group of scientists. It was huge controversy span from Europe to Australia. The UK Broadcast regulator delivered the judgment here : http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/obb114/issue114.pdf
The decision not even finish the disagreement, but rather putting into more political than just science.

I don't know if some of you watch this film already or being air in any US television channel, but just be open about another opinion (some of us begin with skepticism).

More info about controversial film just go to :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle






Monday, October 20, 2008

Google Reader for Sustainable Design Blogs

I created public view of Blogs reader through Google at this link. Everything from Treehugger to Ecofabulous.

Follow this link

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Assigment 3 : Designer's Vision

Both deep and bright green would be inseparable part in design towards sustainability. Rather than put on finger which one that will lead better solution, in degree of creative process, both can be a fundamental based for design.

As McDonough mentioned that we are facing serious problem in design that sustain enough to recycle itself rather than down-cycle it. That’s the key point that designer have to start from different mindset, turned around the concept that waste is useless into how to make material degraded, less pollutant. Waste = Food (or a way around as Braungart’s code).

Designers have to understand the bold figure of core problem, side line the instinct to resolve the problem that already occurred in fist priority. We did not solve the design flaw but we create the truly concept that represent sustainability. Working with nature also the key element to better understanding how element of life (ecology) as we –human be part of it. We looked ourselves being a nature, who able to merge and blend the design into holistic view of biophilia –an idea that seen as another alternative than controversial Gaia Hypothesis by Lovelock).

Bright green mostly been looked as the mass production of green design. In level of those, yes they are. We might move toward the changing the cultures, but then bright design only to make things fashionable. It is fickle and short lives but those episode should be embrace as enlighten of unfriendly natural capitalism. The degree of relief can brought farther and beyond merely fashion.




In a way, I admired Fallingwater –one of Frank Lloyd Wright. Built in 1936-1939 is a sample how utilize environment, working together with contour and natural elements. Even using concrete, but Wright let stone and wood being part of architectural details. In what my perspective, he tried to introduced more earthy architecture (Wright then called it as organic architecture) which is more stressing in harmonic relation between human and environment.


Again Wright’s idea is a basic movement to imply sustainable architecture through design that works along with nature. On Fallingwater, Wright can choose bigger site rather sitting on the river where facing possible slab and cantilever problems. As inspiration, Frank Llyod Wright brought new dimension of design, even though without sacrifice comfort zone as modern human.





Most profoundly, I admired Ben Woodman –from rural Sussex who create Woodman’s Cottage. As Van der Ryn and Cowan’s credo about Five Principles, one of them is Everyone is designer, Ben Woodman truly apply for most of those design principle. He had a land, built from the material gather from woods, using voluntary based worker. He designed himself, vision on what he is going to do, driven to make all the element in house sustainable. Ben aimed to build the house, complete with sun and wind powered electricity, for £25,000.

Both Wright and Woodman just sample of visionary design, looking into how we lives in better environment. Woodman actually show how to make house that sustain itself, producing energy, built from the material surrounding. It was as bold statement that as designer we have to start from the same point. How we make a product better for human being and nature.

Links :

Waste = Food (An inspiring documentary on the Cradle to Cradle design concept).
Film at http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=-3058533428492266222


Sussex : The Woodman's Cottage
Episode from Grand Design Channel 4

Friday, October 10, 2008

Ads Greenwashing : Exxon Mobil vs Repower America

Exxon Mobil one of the biggest company to finance groups of lobby and science to deny climate change launched series of new ads. One of them being banned by British Advertising Standards Authority :

"We concluded that the ad misleadingly implied that natural gas was one of the cleanest sources of energy and that liquefied natural gas was environmentally friendly," ASA said in a statement.







But just a second look at another ad called Repower America from WeCanSolvedit (Al Gore'd group). An ABC Network refused to air the ad because it's content was controversial during Presidential Debate. The ad tried to bring the subject of energy crisis to both candidates about non-oil sources energy and questioned the scandal by oil company to block the progress. Hundreds thousand of people sent massage to ABC to reconsider their decision. Please follow this http://www.wecansolveit.org/page/s/ABC


Sunday, October 5, 2008

How we can make small change



An article from WSJ : A Big Sum of Small Differences about what an average American can make change. Even it's a small it might help reduce emissions from consumer's view.

Picture taken from the article based on the McKinsey Report : Reducing US Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Thursday, October 2, 2008















On West Coast Green, I met Gerald Long from Deconstruction & Reuse Network, Inc. What his doing is remove materials from house, reuse and recycle to reduce the amount of excessive to landfill. Although it can be categorized as down-value but deconstruction people try to change the view about cost saving. Gerald said that most of people who approach him were architect who like to work closely by deliver some reuse material.

In an article last Sunday at NY Times : This Old Recycle House gave insight view about similar program in Cleveland. Brad Guy, president of Building Materials Reuse Association who also did deconstruction himself try to convinced people the benefit of keep the material in good shape rather than demolish it. The labor cost (it takes longer to knock the house down) compared to the value of the materials versus the time and money sell to Rebuilding Centre -reuse material retail in Oregon.

Facts :
  1. Nearly 30 percent of a deconstruction job’s total labor hours can be spent denailing wood;
  2. America generates a total of 160 million tons of construction and demolition debris every year, 60 percent of which is landfilled.
  3. Maybe as few as 300 homes were fully deconstructed in America last year
  4. The average American house is only 32 years old
  5. Deconstruction reclaimed more than 98 percent of certain structures
  6. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, new construction consumes 60 percent of all materials used in the nation’s economy every year, excluding food and fuel.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Assignment 1 : Sustainable guilty






The guilty I’ve felt mainly for carbon emission we’ve produced during flight in the past two years. If the carbon footprint measurement put together that’s might be more than 100hours in long haul flight overall. And the worse from that I felt no obligation to replace the carbon that been spilled into our atmosphere with something, say money. On that day, we know the quantities but as inner denial told us that we’ve have to travel with flight. No other choices.

We saw skeptically about Carbon offset run by Airlines (British Airways & Virgin Atlantic). I study their program, and the deeper I know the more I feel been exploited by this ‘guilty’. The money that we paid for carbon emission in barter with trees program in somewhere in South America seemed the only way to compensate our life style.

A study run by Manchester Metropolitan University called Omega showed that most of respondent know about carbon offsetting but only tenth had done anything about it. The reason mainly because people look that climate impact of flight has to be the airlines and the government responsibility. Also lacked of transparency among the carbon offset provider, how to calculate, where the money raised and how it’s been invested.

My concern mainly about controlling the projects which been paid by passenger carbon monies should be having influence into distribution of green environment. Since most of airlines using third party or organization there should be a clear system to maintain such fund. I am probably demand sort of half annual report from overall performance. We -as passenger not just toss out this guilt, but wonder how this scheme can actually work and contribute better world.

Recently I watched BBC program Should I Really Give Up Flying which give me in-depth view about our passion being in the plane. It’s fast, convenient with our life style that moving one place to another in such rocket pace. But I am beginning to think about using other type of transport such as train. I began missed what I called slow travel (yes, that came from slow food movement) done by explorer many years ago. Last year I even launch the program of “Green Travel” at Indobackpacker, a community based in Indonesia by challenge anyone to take train ride from Singapore to London in less than 30 days.

The only activity I have been proud for being sustainable is producing my own food. I am keen vegetable gardener back few years ago while living in Midlands United Kingdom. We have a small plot what it called allotment or community gardening which run by council/city. It’s only cost about £20 for a year membership including access to seeds bank (sort of seeds to distribute to gardener prior launching to the open market).

It’s been great experience for me to understand what mean being “sustainable” . It’s not only green or organic but to get to close to the earth, air, water and plants. But mainly understand how the food chain started from scratch to reach our table. The process related with human as part of the nature itself. The natural resources should be used to the level that can be reproduced naturally.

I am also knew what the impact of imbalance use of lands. I have got plot that being neglected for couple years. It became culprit as full of weeds, spreading across neighborhood. The evil chain makes the whole community garden even worse. When I came along, my neighbors were pleased. Finally someone will fix the cause, they said.
Indeed, I worked hard to clear out the weeds, built greenhouse from second hand, made little pond to create better environment –by introducing natural enemies. I choose not using any pesticide or herbicide. I’ve relay on my muscle. I’ve need exercise anyway.

The plant cycle sometimes ended up in compost heap. As gardener, we saw ourselves as part of this cycle. We actually boost the compost process by using it as toilet. I learned that we, as human can create nature to act slow, faster or even stop. We are having control, but those ability only limited.

Since move to US few months ago, I did not have this opportunity anymore. We’ve living in townhouse with nicely pedicure lawn –but not allowed to maintain ourselves. The side plot have less sun exposure, with clayish soil, make it difficult to plant vegetables. At the moment there are tomatoes and pepper, including few herbs. Although there are not such abundant harvests, but I have good yield.

But it did not stop me at all to keep gardening. I am joining One Brick Volunteer a day for landscaping program in East Palo Alto School. Those area such in state that have no supermarket chain, no shop to sell fresh vegetables. What the school done is to create community garden run by students, locals and parents. They spent one two hours in a week to help maintain whole plot. The school also has a scheme to sell their yield on Sunday along with church community market during summer this year.

I believe I can make a change. Even though that’s only small one.